Quorum Quorum

Stop asking one AI.
Start orchestrating consensus.

Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok debate your questions through structured methods — and synthesize answers you can trust.

Watch 4 models debate a real business question — and see why one AI isn't enough.

See the Difference

"A dream project just landed — but it requires skills we're still building. Accept and figure it out, find a partner, or wait for one we're ready for?"

Method: Standard Consensus

Direct Response
Single AI
Grok Gemini Claude GPT-5
3 AI models ready to debate
Independent Answers
Grok
Grok
Gemini
Gemini
Claude
Claude
GPT-5
GPT-5
Critique
Grok
Grok

Agrees:

Disagrees:

Missing:

Gemini
Gemini

Agrees:

Disagrees:

Missing:

Claude
Claude

Agrees:

Disagrees:

Missing:

GPT-5
GPT-5

Agrees:

Disagrees:

Missing:

Discussion
Grok
Grok Turn 1
Gemini
Gemini Turn 2
Claude
Claude Turn 3

+ 5 more exchanges...

Final Positions
Grok
Grok
MEDIUM
Gemini
Gemini
HIGH
Claude
Claude
HIGH
GPT-5
GPT-5
HIGH
Synthesis
Synthesizer
Building consensus...
Consensus Reached

7 Structured Debate Methods

Each method is designed for specific decision types. Choose the right framework for your question.

2+ models

Standard Method

Build consensus through structured dialogue

Round-robin discussion with all models

Best for: General questions, team decisions, balanced agreement
Try it with:

"Should our startup pivot to B2B or stay B2C?"

Process Flow

1
Independent
2
Critique
3
Discuss
4
Positions
5
Synthesis
2+ models (even)

Oxford Method

Parliamentary-style formal debate

Formal debate with FOR/AGAINST teams

Best for: Binary yes/no decisions, policy questions, contentious topics
Try it with:

"Should remote work be mandatory for all knowledge workers?"

Process Flow

1
Opening
2
Rebuttals
3
Closing
4
Judgement
3+ models

Advocate Method

Stress-test ideas through cross-examination

Devil's advocate challenges the group

Best for: Risk assessment, due diligence, validating assumptions
Try it with:

"Is our go-to-market strategy solid enough for launch?"

Process Flow

1
Positions
2
Cross-Exam
3
Verdict
2+ models Advanced

Socratic Method

Discover truth through questioning

Question-driven deep exploration

Best for: Complex concepts, exposing assumptions, philosophical inquiry
Try it with:

"What does "good code" really mean for our team?"

Process Flow

1
Thesis
2
Inquiry
3
Insights
3+ models Advanced

Delphi Method

Converge on estimates through anonymous rounds

Iterative estimation refinement

Best for: Time/cost forecasting, predictions, numeric decisions
Try it with:

"How many engineering hires will we need in 2025?"

Process Flow

1
Round 1
2
Round 2
3
Round 3
4
Synthesis
2+ models

Brainstorm Method

Diverge wildly, then converge on gold

Diverge, build, and converge on ideas

Best for: Creative solutions, innovation, ideation sessions
Try it with:

"How might we reduce customer onboarding friction?"

Process Flow

1
Diverge
2
Build
3
Converge
4
Select
2+ models

Tradeoff Method

Evaluate options against weighted criteria

Criteria-based option evaluation

Best for: Vendor selection, tech stack choices, comparing alternatives
Try it with:

"Which cloud provider should we use: AWS, GCP, or Azure?"

Process Flow

1
Frame
2
Criteria
3
Evaluate
4
Decide

Simple, Transparent Pricing

Start free with your own API keys, or let us handle everything.

🔑

Bring Your Own Keys

Free forever
  • 15 discussions per month
  • Use your existing API keys
  • All 7 discussion methods
  • Full discussion history
Get Started Free

We Handle It

$19 /month
  • Unlimited discussions
  • Pre-configured API access
  • Priority model access
  • Team collaboration (coming soon)
See Pro Features

Ready to decide with a panel, not a single voice?

Your next important decision deserves more than one perspective.

Start Your First Discussion — Free