Standard
Open discussion where models share perspectives, critique each other, and build toward synthesis naturally.
Ideal for: General questions requiring balanced analysis
Multi-Model AI Deliberation
One AI gives you an answer. A council gives you wisdom.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok deliberate your questions through structured methods—then synthesize consensus you can trust.
"The best decisions are never made by a single voice. They emerge from the collision of perspectives, the testing of assumptions, the synthesis of disagreement."
— The principle behind every great deliberation
See the difference.
One voice vs. many.
Watch how a single AI answer compares to structured multi-model deliberation on the same question.
See the Difference
"A dream project just landed — but it requires skills we're still building. Accept and figure it out, find a partner, or wait for one we're ready for?"
Method: Standard Consensus
Direct Response
Limited
Single AI
Click "Start Discussion" to begin
Single AI
Thinking...
Waiting while models debate...
- No multi-model debate to stress-test assumptions
- Single perspective without challenging viewpoints
- No quantified thresholds (Quorum's 6-Step Stack has specific numbers)
- Missing domain risk filter for regulated industries
- No team capacity or burnout considerations
Multi-Model Debate
Grok
Gemini
Claude
GPT-5
4 AI models ready to debate
Independent Answers
Grok
Gemini
Claude
GPT-5
Critique
Grok
Gemini
Claude
GPT-5
Discussion
Grok
Gemini
Claude
+ 5 more exchanges...
Final Positions
Grok
Gemini
Claude
GPT-5
Synthesis
Synthesizer
Building consensus...
Consensus Reached
Remaining differences:
Seven Methods of Deliberation
Each seat at the table serves a different purpose
Oxford
Formal debate structure with proposition and opposition teams. Rigorous argumentation with clear sides.
Ideal for: Controversial topics, policy decisions
Advocate
One model plays devil's advocate, actively challenging the emerging consensus to stress-test ideas.
Ideal for: Important decisions needing scrutiny
Socratic
Progressive questioning that peels back assumptions layer by layer, revealing deeper truths.
Ideal for: Complex philosophical or ethical questions
Delphi
Anonymous rounds where models refine estimates and predictions without anchoring bias.
Ideal for: Forecasting, estimation problems
Brainstorm
Divergent creativity first, convergent evaluation second. Quantity breeds quality.
Ideal for: Creative problems, idea generation
Tradeoff
Explicit analysis of competing options across defined criteria with weighted scoring.
Ideal for: Multi-criteria decisions, vendor selection
4
AI Models deliberating together
7
Structured discussion methods
1
Synthesized consensus
"I used to ask ChatGPT, then Claude, then Gemini the same question and try to synthesize answers myself. Quorum does this automatically—and the structured debate surfaces perspectives I wouldn't have thought to seek."
Your next important decision deserves more than a single perspective.
Convene the council. Let the deliberation begin.
Enter the Chamber